-----Original Message-----
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <redacted>
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:12 PM
To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <redacted>; Juraj Linkeš
[off-list ref]; bruce.richardson@intel.com; Ruifeng Wang
[off-list ref]; Phil Yang [off-list ref];
vcchunga@amazon.com; Dharmik Thakkar [off-list ref];
jerinjacobk@gmail.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
(ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com) [off-list ref];
ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <redacted>; nd <redacted>
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework

<snip>

quoted

quoted

v14:
Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).

Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob [off-list ref] Series Tested-by:
Jerin Jacob [off-list ref] Series Tested-by: Dharmik Thakkar
[off-list ref] Series Tested-by: Vimal Chungath
[off-list ref]

Series Tested-by: Pavan Nikhilesh [off-list ref]

Also, I believe we need to take a look at ARCH_SOC_ID support coming
up in
5.9 kernel.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200506164411.3284-1-
sudeep.holla@arm.com/

Agree, it can come after this series is merged.

Note that it requires firmware with SMCCC v1.2 support in the underlying
platform.

I have a few questions to everyone:
Is there any comprehensive documentation about how to use this? Things like where in Linux can I get the ARCH_SOC_ID and how are the ID's mapped to socs?
If the ID mappings are not public then the plaform owners would need to add the support, right?