Thread (201 messages) 201 messages, 7 authors, 2013-02-13

Re: [ 016/173] use clamp_t in UNAME26 fix

From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-29 08:16:08
Also in: lkml

Ben Hutchings wrote:
The min/max call needed to have explicit types on some architectures
(e.g. mn10300). Use clamp_t instead to avoid the warning:

  kernel/sys.c: In function 'override_release':
  kernel/sys.c:1287:10: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <redacted>
[...]
-		copy = min(sizeof(buf), max_t(size_t, 1, len));
I don't understand how this happens given that v2.6.36-rc1~68
(MN10300: Fix size_t and ssize_t, 2010-08-12) was supposed to fix this
kind of thing.  Doesn't sizeof(buf) have type size_t already (C99
§6.5.3.4 "the sizeof operator" ¶4)?

What version of gcc produces this warning?

Puzzled,
Jonathan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help