Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] bus: ts-nbus: use bitmap_get_value8()
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-21 09:24:39
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-iio, linux-mmc, linux-phy, linux-sound, lkml
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:32:10AM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
On 2/20/25 4:17 AM, Simon Horman wrote:quoted
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:33:31PM -0600, David Lechner wrote:quoted
Use bitmap_get_value8() instead of accessing the bitmap directly. Accessing the bitmap directly is not considered good practice. We now have a helper function that can be used instead, so let's use it. Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <redacted>u> Signed-off-by: David Lechner [off-list ref]quoted
--- drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c b/drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c index b4c9308caf0647a3261071d9527fffce77784af2..beac67f3b820377f8bb1fc4f4ee77e15ee240834 100644 --- a/drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c +++ b/drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ * TS-4600 SoM. */ +#include <linux/bitmap.h> #include <linux/bitops.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/kernel.h>@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ static void ts_nbus_reset_bus(struct ts_nbus *ts_nbus) { DECLARE_BITMAP(values, 8); - values[0] = 0; + bitmap_set_value8(values, byte, 0);Hi David, byte doesn't appear to exist in the scope of this function. I tried this: bitmap_set_value8(values, 0, 8); But when compiling with GCC 14.2.0 I see warnings that values is used uninitialised - bitmap_set_value8() appears to rely on it being so.Ah yes, I see the problem (I don't think this driver compiles with allmodconfig so the compiler didn't catch it for me).
Thanks, that would explain things. FWIIW, I think you can exercise this with allmodconfig by simply running: make drivers/bus/ts-nbus.o
quoted
CC drivers/bus/ts-nbus.o In file included from drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c:13: In function ‘bitmap_write’, inlined from ‘ts_nbus_reset_bus’ at drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c:111:2: ./include/linux/bitmap.h:818:12: error: ‘values’ is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized] 818 | map[index] &= (fit ? (~(mask << offset)) : ~BITMAP_FIRST_WORD_MASK(start)); | ~~~^~~~~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:5, from ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26, from ./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/rwonce.h:1, from ./include/linux/compiler.h:344, from ./include/linux/build_bug.h:5, from ./include/linux/bits.h:22, from ./include/linux/bitops.h:6, from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:8: drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c: In function ‘ts_nbus_reset_bus’: drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c:109:24: note: ‘values’ declared here 109 | DECLARE_BITMAP(values, 8); | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/types.h:11:23: note: in definition of macro ‘DECLARE_BITMAP’ 11 | unsigned long name[BITS_TO_LONGS(bits)] | ^~~~quoted
gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep(ts_nbus->data, values); gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_nbus->csn, 0);@@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ static void ts_nbus_write_byte(struct ts_nbus *ts_nbus, u8 byte) { DECLARE_BITMAP(values, 8);We can fix by zero-initialing the bitmap. DECLARE_BITMAP(values, 8) = { };
Thanks, I confirmed that adding that to ts_nbus_reset_bus() makes the compiler happy. And it seems sensible to me. I guess that theoretically it should also be added to ts_nbus_write_byte(), although GCC has nothing to say about that either way.
Would you like me to send a new version of the patch?
It's not really my call. But I would expect that is a good next step.
quoted
quoted
- values[0] = byte; + bitmap_set_value8(values, byte, 8); gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep(ts_nbus->data, values); }