Thread (79 messages) 79 messages, 4 authors, 2021-10-04

Re: [RFC/PATCH 06/18] ravb: Add multi_tsrq to struct ravb_hw_info

From: Sergey Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-23 20:19:58
Also in: linux-renesas-soc

On 9/23/21 5:08 PM, Biju Das wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
R-Car AVB-DMAC has 4 Transmit start Request queues, whereas
RZ/G2L has only 1 Transmit start Request queue(Best Effort)

Add a multi_tsrq hw feature bit to struct ravb_hw_info to enable
this only for R-Car. This will allow us to add single TSRQ support for
RZ/G2L.

Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h      |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
index bb92469d770e..c043ee555be4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
@@ -1006,6 +1006,7 @@ struct ravb_hw_info {
 	unsigned multi_irqs:1;		/* AVB-DMAC and E-MAC has multiple irqs */
 	unsigned no_gptp:1;		/* AVB-DMAC does not support gPTP feature */
 	unsigned ccc_gac:1;		/* AVB-DMAC has gPTP support active in config mode */
+	unsigned multi_tsrq:1;		/* AVB-DMAC has MULTI TSRQ */
   Maybe 'single_tx_q' instead?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 };
 
 struct ravb_private {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
index 8663d83507a0..d37d73f6d984 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
@@ -776,11 +776,17 @@ static void ravb_rcv_snd_enable(struct net_device *ndev)
 /* function for waiting dma process finished */
 static int ravb_stop_dma(struct net_device *ndev)
 {
+	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;
 	int error;
 
 	/* Wait for stopping the hardware TX process */
-	error = ravb_wait(ndev, TCCR,
-			  TCCR_TSRQ0 | TCCR_TSRQ1 | TCCR_TSRQ2 | TCCR_TSRQ3, 0);
+	if (info->multi_tsrq)
+		error = ravb_wait(ndev, TCCR,
+				  TCCR_TSRQ0 | TCCR_TSRQ1 | TCCR_TSRQ2 | TCCR_TSRQ3, 0);
+	else
+		error = ravb_wait(ndev, TCCR, TCCR_TSRQ0, 0);
   Aren't the TSRQ1/2/3 bits reserved on RZ/G2L? If so, this new flag adds a little value, I think... unless
you plan to use this flag further in the series?

MBR, Sergei
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help