RE: [RFC/PATCH 16/18] ravb: Add Packet receive function for Gigabit Ethernet
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Date: 2021-10-04 14:56:38
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
Hi Sergey, Thanks for the feedback.
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 16/18] ravb: Add Packet receive function for Gigabit Ethernet On 9/23/21 5:08 PM, Biju Das wrote:quoted
This patch series adds RX(packet receive) function for Gigabit Ethernet found on RZ/G2L SoC. Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.hb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h index b0e067a6a8ee..85260f89e1cd 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h@@ -1092,6 +1092,7 @@ struct ravb_private { int duplex; struct ravb_rx_desc *rgeth_rx_ring[NUM_RX_QUEUE]; + struct sk_buff *rxtop_skb;I'd prefer for this one declared earler in the *struct*, as well. And why not e.g 'rx_1st_skb'?
OK Will use 'rx_1st_skb' in the next RFC version.
quoted
const struct ravb_hw_info *info; struct reset_control *rstc;diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index a08da7a37b92..867e180e6655 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c@@ -705,6 +705,23 @@ static void ravb_get_tx_tstamp(struct net_device*ndev)quoted
} } +static void ravb_rx_csum_rgeth(struct sk_buff *skb) { + u8 *hw_csum; + + /* The hardware checksum is contained in sizeof(__sum16) (2) bytes + * appended to packet data + */ + if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__sum16))) + return; + hw_csum = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - sizeof(__sum16); + + if (*hw_csum == 0) + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; + else + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;Mhm, what's the point of this whole function then? Why it can't be a copy of the R-Car analog?
This function should come after CSR initialization. Next RFC I will taken care of this. *hwcsum == 0 means, there is no error in checksum. So it should be OK.
[...]quoted
@@ -720,11 +737,147 @@ static void ravb_rx_csum(struct sk_buff *skb)[...]quoted
/* Packet receive function for Gigabit Ethernet */ static bool ravb_rgeth_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q) { - /* Place holder */ - return true; + struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + int entry = priv->cur_rx[q] % priv->num_rx_ring[q]; + int boguscnt = priv->dirty_rx[q] + priv->num_rx_ring[q] - priv- cur_rx[q]; + struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->stats[q];[q] should be dropped, as we've agreed...
nc_queue feature bit will take care of this. So the q will be always RVAB_BE.
quoted
+ struct ravb_rx_desc *desc; + struct sk_buff *skb; + dma_addr_t dma_addr; + u8 desc_status; + u8 die_dt; + u16 pkt_len; + int limit; + + boguscnt = min(boguscnt, *quota); + limit = boguscnt; + desc = &priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q][entry]; + while (desc->die_dt != DT_FEMPTY) { + /* Descriptor type must be checked before all other reads */ + dma_rmb(); + desc_status = desc->msc; + pkt_len = le16_to_cpu(desc->ds_cc) & RX_DS; + + if (--boguscnt < 0) + break; + + /* We use 0-byte descriptors to mark the DMA mapping errors */ + if (!pkt_len) + continue; + + if (desc_status & MSC_MC) + stats->multicast++; + + if (desc_status & (MSC_CRC | MSC_RFE | MSC_RTSF | MSC_RTLF |MSC_CEEF)) {quoted
+ stats->rx_errors++; + if (desc_status & MSC_CRC) + stats->rx_crc_errors++; + if (desc_status & MSC_RFE) + stats->rx_frame_errors++; + if (desc_status & (MSC_RTLF | MSC_RTSF)) + stats->rx_length_errors++; + if (desc_status & MSC_CEEF) + stats->rx_missed_errors++; + } else { + die_dt = desc->die_dt & 0xF0; + switch (die_dt) { + case DT_FSINGLE: + skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q, entry, desc); + skb_put(skb, pkt_len); + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev); + if (ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) + ravb_rx_csum_rgeth(skb); + napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi[q], skb); + stats->rx_packets++; + stats->rx_bytes += pkt_len; + break; + case DT_FSTART: + priv->rxtop_skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q,entry, desc); But don't you need to copy the data in this case?
It is not required, here.
quoted
+ skb_put(priv->rxtop_skb, pkt_len); + break; + case DT_FMID: + skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q, entry, desc); + skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(priv->rxtop_skb, + priv->rxtop_skb->len, + skb->data, + pkt_len); + skb_put(priv->rxtop_skb, pkt_len); + dev_kfree_skb(skb); + break; + case DT_FEND: + skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q, entry, desc); + skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(priv->rxtop_skb, + priv->rxtop_skb->len, + skb->data, + pkt_len); + skb_put(priv->rxtop_skb, pkt_len); + dev_kfree_skb(skb); + priv->rxtop_skb->protocol = + eth_type_trans(priv->rxtop_skb, ndev); + if (ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) + ravb_rx_csum_rgeth(skb); + napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi[q], + priv->rxtop_skb); + stats->rx_packets++; + stats->rx_bytes += priv->rxtop_skb->len; + break; + } + } + + entry = (++priv->cur_rx[q]) % priv->num_rx_ring[q]; + desc = &priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q][entry]; + } + + /* Refill the RX ring buffers. */ + for (; priv->cur_rx[q] - priv->dirty_rx[q] > 0; priv->dirty_rx[q]++){quoted
+ entry = priv->dirty_rx[q] % priv->num_rx_ring[q]; + desc = &priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q][entry]; + desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(RGETH_RX_DESC_DATA_SIZE); + + if (!priv->rx_skb[q][entry]) { + skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, + RGETH_RX_BUFF_MAX + RAVB_ALIGN - 1);ALIGN(RGETH_RX_BUFF_MAX, RAVB_ALIGN)?
It is taken care in next RFC. Regards, Biju
[...] MBR, Sergey