Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 7 authors, 2019-09-19

Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/5] Support fraglist GRO/GSO

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: 2019-09-19 11:01:29

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 01:58:17PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:17:08PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
More specifically, whether we can remove that in favor of using your
new skb_segment_list. That would actually be a big first step in
simplifying skb_segment back to something manageable.
The main issue (that I know) on obsoleting GSO_BY_FRAGS is that
dealing with frags instead of frag_list was considered easier to be
offloaded, if ever attempted.  So this would be a step back on that
aspect.  Other than this, it should be doable.
I wonder why offloading the frag_list should be harder.
I looked at the i40e driver, it just iterates over the page
fragments found in skb_shinfo(skb)->frags in i40e_tx_map().

If the packet data of all the fraglist GRO skbs are backed by a
page fragment then we could just do the same by iterating with
skb_walk_frags(). I'm not a driver expert and might be misstaken,
but it looks like that could be done with existing hardware that
supports segmentation offload.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help