Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/5] net: Add NETIF_F_GRO_LIST feature
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: 2019-09-19 09:32:16
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 08:04:18PM -0600, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
On 2019-09-18 10:10, Willem de Bruijn wrote:quoted
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:25 AM Steffen Klassert [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This adds a new NETIF_F_GRO_LIST feature flag. I will be used to configure listfyed GRO what will be implemented with some followup paches.This should probably simultaneously introduce SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST as well as a BUILD_BUG_ON in net_gso_ok. Please also in the commit describe the constraints of skbs that have this type. If I'm not mistaken, an skb with either gso_size linear data or one gso_sized frag, followed by a frag_list of the same. With the exception of the last frag_list member, whose mss may be less than gso_size. This will help when reasoning about all the types of skbs we may see at segmentation, as we recently had to do [1]Would it be preferrable to allow any size skbs for the listification.
We currently require a single gso_size because we adjust uh->len on the head skb to the full size to do correct memory accounting on the local input path. That is going to be restored with the gso_size on segmentation.
Since the original skbs are being restored, single gso_size shoudln't be a constraint here.
It might be possible to allow any sized skbs with some extra work, though.