Thread (64 messages) flat view 64 messages, 10 authors, 2016-12-11

Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses.

From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Date: 2016-12-05 22:55:22
Also in: lkml

On 05.12.2016 23:40, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2016-12-05 23:37:09, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
quoted
Hi Pavel,

On 05.12.2016 23:02, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted
we need spin_lock_bh at minimum, as we are locking user context
against timer.

Best regards,
									Pavel
I was referring to stmmac_tx_clean() which AFAICS is only called from softirq context,
(one time in the timer handler and one time in napi poll handler) so a spin_lock() should
be sufficient. I cant see how this is called from userspace. If it were, a spin_lock_bh() had
to be used, of course.
stmmac_tx_clean() shares lock with stmmac_tx() -- and that's process
context as far as I can tell. So... spin_lock_bh() at
minimum... right?

									Pavel
You mean stmmac_xmit()? Thats also softirq AFAICT, its the TX softirq....

Regards,
Lino
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help