On 05.12.2016 23:40, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2016-12-05 23:37:09, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
quoted
Hi Pavel,
On 05.12.2016 23:02, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted
we need spin_lock_bh at minimum, as we are locking user context
against timer.
Best regards,
Pavel
I was referring to stmmac_tx_clean() which AFAICS is only called from softirq context,
(one time in the timer handler and one time in napi poll handler) so a spin_lock() should
be sufficient. I cant see how this is called from userspace. If it were, a spin_lock_bh() had
to be used, of course.
stmmac_tx_clean() shares lock with stmmac_tx() -- and that's process
context as far as I can tell. So... spin_lock_bh() at
minimum... right?
Pavel
You mean stmmac_xmit()? Thats also softirq AFAICT, its the TX softirq....
Regards,
Lino