Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sock_rps_record_flow() is for connected sockets
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-12-07 07:57:13
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 22:47 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 19:32 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
A follow up patch will provide a static_key (Jump Label) since most hosts do not even use RFS.Speaking of static_key, it appears we now have GRO on UDP, and this consumes a considerable amount of cpu cycles. Turning off GRO allows me to get +20 % more packets on my single UDP socket. (1.2 Mpps instead of 1.0 Mpps)
I see also an improvement for single flow tests disabling GRO, but on a smaller scale (~5% if I recall correctly).
Surely udp_gro_receive() should be bypassed if no UDP socket has
registered a udp_sk(sk)->gro_receive handler
And/or delay the inet_add_offload(&udpv{4|6}_offload, IPPROTO_UDP); to
the first UDP sockets setting udp_sk(sk)->gro_receive handler,
ie udp_encap_enable() and udpv6_encap_enable()I had some patches adding explicit static keys for udp_gro_receive, but they were ugly and I did not get that much gain (I measured ~1-2% skipping udp_gro_receive only). I can try to refresh them anyway. We have some experimental patches to implement GRO for plain UDP connected sockets, using frag_list to preserve the individual skb len, and deliver the packet to user space individually. With that I got ~3mpps with a single queue/user space sink - before the recent udp improvements. I would like to present these patches on netdev soon (no sooner than next week, anyway). Cheers, Paolo