Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 5 authors, 2007-08-27

Re: [PATCH] fix e100 rx path on ARM (was [PATCH] e100 rx: or s and el bits)

From: Kok, Auke <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-05 17:43:21

Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:27:19AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
quoted
We need to make sure that now that we're getting closer to 2.6.22 we don't 
end up killing e100 in it. Should we drop the current fixes in it to be on 
the safe side and aim for 2.6.23? I would hate to see an untested codepath 
breaking e100 on something like ppc or mips... that will be very painful
I certainly agree with this assessment...

I've been wondering if, based on all this recent work, we should revert
the s-bit stuff and wait for 2.6.23.
Yes, that's my point. If Milton and David agree I think we should do so immediately.

If so, do you want me to write a revert-patch or do you have some magic to do 
that for me?

Auke
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help