Re: [PATCH] fix e100 rx path on ARM (was [PATCH] e100 rx: or s and el bits)

Jeff Garzik wrote:

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:27:19AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:

quoted

We need to make sure that now that we're getting closer to 2.6.22 we don't 
end up killing e100 in it. Should we drop the current fixes in it to be on 
the safe side and aim for 2.6.23? I would hate to see an untested codepath 
breaking e100 on something like ppc or mips... that will be very painful

I certainly agree with this assessment...

I've been wondering if, based on all this recent work, we should revert
the s-bit stuff and wait for 2.6.23.

I think so.  It will be no worse then it was and make the patch that 
fixes it clearer.
-Ack

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/