Re: [PATCH] fix e100 rx path on ARM (was [PATCH] e100 rx: or s and el bits)
From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-05 17:39:06
From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-05 17:39:06
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:27:19AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
We need to make sure that now that we're getting closer to 2.6.22 we don't end up killing e100 in it. Should we drop the current fixes in it to be on the safe side and aim for 2.6.23? I would hate to see an untested codepath breaking e100 on something like ppc or mips... that will be very painful
I certainly agree with this assessment... I've been wondering if, based on all this recent work, we should revert the s-bit stuff and wait for 2.6.23. Jeff