Thread (64 messages) 64 messages, 7 authors, 2007-01-12

Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)

From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-11 08:28:05

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:40:35PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Jarek Poplawski <redacted>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:24:28 +0100
quoted
Yesterday I did what I should do earlier - checked
this simple way, with printk, and now I have no doubts
it's a bug: if you add or remove vlan devices with
vconfig, register_vlan_device and unregister_vlan_dev
are called by ioctl and they use and change rcu
procetded data without preemption disabled so vlan
rcu hash lists could become corrupted or find results
could be wrong.
Those two operations do their modifications and changes under the RTNL
semaphore, via rtnl_lock() and rtnl_unlock() which guarentees that no
other modifications can occur.
Sure, but is this even legal to be preempted during
reading or modifying rcu list? Doesn't this disturb
rcu cycle and make possible memory release problems?

Jarek P.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help