Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)
From: Ben Greear <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-03 16:58:48
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:07:11AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:35:39PM -0800, David Stevens wrote:quoted
I've looked at this a little too -- it'd be nice to know who holds the write lock.If you mean mc_list_lock - probably nobody - it's not initialized (so the timers) for this in_deviceI should say: "... probably not initialized ...".
That should print out the debugging when you access an un-initialized lock, and I did not see that print-out in the logs. I looked at the code and could not explain how it could be accessed un-initialized, so I'm not certain this is the problem. If I can reproduce this in a controlled manner, I'll add debugging to print out who is holding the lock (if anyone), as well as make sure it is initialized before the blocking method initializes it. It will likely be a few days before we can set up something to reproduce it, however. If you can explain any code path that could leave the lock uninitialized, then that would be a big help...but it looked ok to me... Ben
Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Ben Greear [off-list ref] Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com