Thread (64 messages) 64 messages, 7 authors, 2007-01-12

Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)

From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-04 08:48:34

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 07:29:30PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:03:51AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
quoted
I doubt this is the right solution. It certainly
could fix this particular situation but my main
point was packets shouldn't get into kernel
receive queues with skb->dev not IFF_UP.
I think you misunderstood.  The device certainly is IFF_UP.  What
happens is that the multicast spin locks are set up too late:
Could you explain? I can see some inet_rtm_newaddr
interrupted. For me it could be e.g.:

after
vconfig add eth0 9

ip addr add dev eth0.9 ...

before
ip link set dev eth0.9 up

Jarek P.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help