Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)
From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-04 08:48:34
From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-04 08:48:34
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 07:29:30PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:03:51AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:quoted
I doubt this is the right solution. It certainly could fix this particular situation but my main point was packets shouldn't get into kernel receive queues with skb->dev not IFF_UP.I think you misunderstood. The device certainly is IFF_UP. What happens is that the multicast spin locks are set up too late:
Could you explain? I can see some inet_rtm_newaddr interrupted. For me it could be e.g.: after vconfig add eth0 9 ip addr add dev eth0.9 ... before ip link set dev eth0.9 up Jarek P.