Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)
From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-10 09:02:19
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:10:45AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:03:50AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
* Must be invoked with RCU read lock (no preempt) */ struct net_device *__find_vlan_dev(struct net_device *real_dev, ... But later in this file no sign of disabling preemption for these calls and for hlist_add_head_rcu and hlist_del_rcu. I can't imagine how this works?Preempt is already disabled on the receive path.I'm not sure you're talking about the same thing -
Hello Stephen, It looks like you're talking about the right thing and I'm a fool again! Now I try to find why I even had to pay for this. I read again and again adequate chapters from R. Love and C. Benvenuti's books, see a lot about kernel preemption in 2.6, but can't see anything about preemption disabled in ioctls - maybe I'm blind or they are badly translated. Now I look into "Linux Device Drivers", see ch. 6 about ioctls, blocking I/O and RCU, but nothing about preemption disabled again. Maybe this is omited because it's obvious to people who started hacking with earlier kernels? When I added to this things like: "If the mutex is not available right now, it will sleep until it can get it." and "It is illegal to block while in an RCU read-side critical section." I didn't even try to think about mutex or malloc with GFP_KERNEL inside RCU block. I'm enormously grateful you didn't lose patience in guiding me yet - I hope it'll save this list from nervous breakdown. Many thanks and regards as always, Jarek P. PS: probably you could profit from this some day and write something like "Linux Internals for Dummies" - it would be simple cut & paste of my discoveries and your responses!