Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: Ralph Doncaster <hidden>
Date: 2003-06-10 17:19:41
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Simon Kirby [off-list ref] Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 18:53:12 -0700 Your CPU use is quite a bit higher than ours. Yeah, but his faster cpu is all being burnt to a crisp doing PIO accesses to the 3c59x card. I found that once NAPI was happening, userspace seemed to get a fairly decent amount of time. Unfortunately, NAPI won't help him with the current way the 3c59x driver works. It needs to provide a way to use MEM I/O before NAPI would start to be of use to him.
Well, I've already decided to retire the 3c905cx cards and drop in a couple of the Pro/1000 cards I recently bought. Considering the Intel GigE cards cost me ~$50 now and the 3Coms are ~$45, I'd say anyone willing to update 3c59x.c has misplaced priorities or too much time on their hands... -Ralph