Thread (209 messages) 209 messages, 18 authors, 2003-06-17

RE: Route cache performance under stress

From: Pekka Savola <hidden>
Date: 2003-06-10 11:41:08

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Jamal Hadi wrote:
Typically, real world is less intense than the lab. Ex: noone sends
100Mbps at 64 byte packet size.
Some attackers do, and if your box dies because of that.. well, you don't 
like it and your managers certainly don't :-)
Typical packet is around 500 bytes
average. 
Not sure that's really the case.  I have the impression the traffic is 
basically something like:
 - close to 1500 bytes (data transfers)
 - between 40-100 bytes (TCP acks, simple UDP requests, etc.)
 - something in between
If linux can handle that forwarding capacity, it should easily
be doing close to Gige real world capacity.
Yes, but not the worst case capacity you really have to plan for :-(
Have you seen how the big boys advertise? when tuning specs they talk
about bits/sec. Juniper just announced a blade at supercom that can do
firewalling at 500Mbps.
May be for some, but they *DO* give their pps figures also; many operators
do, in fact, *explicitly* check the pps figures especially when there are
some slower-path features in use (ACL's, IPv6, multicast, RPF, etc.):  
that's much more important than the optimal figures which are great for 
advertising material and press releases :-).

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help