On 04.07.2012, at 17:37, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:=0A=
=0A=
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----=0A=
From: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-=0A=
owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf=0A=
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 6:14 PM=0A=
To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008=0A=
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-=0A=
dev@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-ppc@nongnu.org=0A=
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 15/17] KVM: PPC64: bookehv: Add=0A=
support for interrupt handling=0A=
=0A=
Is this code so vastly different from the 32bit variant that they can't=
=0A=
quoted
quoted
be the same with a few simple ifdef's here and there?=0A=
=0A=
As you can see from input register values things are quite different. I =
strived=0A=
quoted
to keep the code common, the only divergence is in the kvm_handler defin=
itions.=0A=
=0A=
What a shame :(. A lot of it looks very very similar.=0A=
=0A=
The Devil is in the details ;)=0A=
=0A=
-Mike=