Re: [PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: introduce localbus and pata nodes
From: Anton Vorontsov <hidden>
Date: 2007-11-27 19:57:20
Also in:
linux-ide
From: Anton Vorontsov <hidden>
Date: 2007-11-27 19:57:20
Also in:
linux-ide
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:07:14PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
2. "ioport" because shift^Wstride ;-) applies only to the io range (yes, it's obvious, but worth open-wording, no?).quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Contrarywise, to memory range.quoted
quoted
quoted
By io range I meant "I/O base", in contrast to "CTL base".quoted
quoted
quoted
There is no need to apply shifting for CTL. That's why ioport-* appeared in the first place.quoted
quoted
So, a matter of wrong terminology then. The thing that you meant by "I/O" is actually called "command block".quoted
Yes. And IO is the second name.I'd say the first place in drivers/ide belongs to the historic name "taskfile". The "command block" which is as ATA standard calls it, is hardly used.quoted
It's used widespread in the drivers/ide/.Don't remember seeing it.
Oops, thinko -- not drivers/ide/, but include/linux/ide.h. Grep for io_addr.
quoted
Now you understand why I'm so reluctant to hanging up different labels on the single thing? ;-):-)
-- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2