RE: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] Walnut DTS

[snip]

There is no child device node, but there are child interrupt=20
nodes, and
since the interrupt-tree uses #address/size-cells, it does make some
sense to specify them.
=20
Yes, there is a default value when absent, but the simple=20
fact that the
default is different depending if you are doing a device walk or an
interrupt tree walk is very confusing. As I said above, the default
values are a source of more problem than anything else and I tend to
think they should be banned.
=20
I would personally be inclined to define that whatever spec we come up
with always require #address-cells/#size-cells for any node that can
have either device children or interrupt children, and ban default
values alltogether.

Did you really mean #size-cells here?  Shouldn't it be #interrupt-cells?

Stuart