Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8] 4xx MMU
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2007-07-11 20:58:37
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Josh Boyer wrote:
+#elif defined(CONFIG_40x) +/* 40x-style software loaded TLB */ +# =A0include <asm/mmu-4xx.h> =A0#elif defined(CONFIG_44x) =A0/* 44x-style software loaded TLB */ =A0# =A0include <asm/mmu-44x.h>
If you call it mmu-4xx, shouldn't it be used for 44x as well? I would think this either should be
+#elif defined(CONFIG_4xx) +/* 40x-style software loaded TLB */ +# include <asm/mmu-4xx.h> -#elif defined(CONFIG_44x) -/* 44x-style software loaded TLB */ -# include <asm/mmu-44x.h>
or=20
+#elif defined(CONFIG_40x) +/* 40x-style software loaded TLB */ +# include <asm/mmu-40x.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_44x) /* 44x-style software loaded TLB */ # include <asm/mmu-44x.h>
Is it actually feasible to get to a point where you can build a kernel that boots on both 40x and 44x, or is it just too different? Arnd <><