Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8] 4xx MMU

On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 02:09 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:

quoted

Is it actually feasible to get to a point where
you can build a kernel that boots on both
40x and 44x, or is it just too different?

I'm guessing its too different since 40x probably has a real mode and  
44x doesnt.

Among other things.

However, I agree we should go ahead and rename 4xx to 40x at this  
point in arch/powerpc.

Yeah.  See my response to Arnd about getting a git tree in place to do
it.  RSN :)

josh