On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:20 PM, James Morris [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Kees Cook wrote:

quoted

LSM initialization failures have traditionally been ignored. We should
at least WARN when something goes wrong.

I guess we could have a boot param which specifies what to do if any LSM
fails to init, as I think some folks will want to stop execution at that
point.

Thoughts?

I'm not opposed, but I won't author it because Linus will yell at me
about introducing a "machine killing" option.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security