Thread (92 messages) 92 messages, 7 authors, 2018-10-08

Re: [PATCH security-next v4 23/32] selinux: Remove boot parameter

From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Date: 2018-10-03 00:05:50
Also in: linux-arch, linux-doc, lkml

On 10/02/2018 04:54 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:46 PM, John Johansen
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 10/02/2018 04:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
I think the current proposal (in the other thread) is likely the
sanest approach:

- Drop CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE
- Drop CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_BOOTPARAM_VALUE
- All enabled LSMs are listed at build-time in CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE
Hrrmmm isn't this a Kconfig selectable list, with each built-in LSM
available to be enabled by default at boot.
That's not how I have it currently. It's a comma-separated a string,
including the reserved name "all". The default would just be
"CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE=all". Casey and I wanted this to have a way to
capture new LSMs by default at build-time.
I understand where you are coming from, but speaking with my distro
hat on, that is not going to work. As a distro Ubuntu very much wants
to be able to offer all the LSMs built in to the kernel so the user
can select them. But very much wants to be able to specify a default
supported subset that is enabled at boot.

I expect RH and Suse will feel similarily. Speaking for Ubuntu if this
isn't available as part of lsm stacking it will get distro patched in.
quoted
quoted
- Boot time enabling for selinux= and apparmor= remain
- lsm.enable= is explicit: overrides above and omissions are disabled
wfm
Okay, this is closer to v3 than v4. Paul or Stephen, how do you feel
about losing the SELinux bootparam CONFIG? (i.e. CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE
would be replacing its functionality.)

-Kees
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help