Thread (108 messages) 108 messages, 8 authors, 2015-01-13

Re: [PATCH RFC 19/67] MIPS: asm: atomic: Update asm and ISA constrains for MIPS R6 support

From: Måns Rullgård <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-18 18:59:13

David Daney [off-list ref] writes:
On 12/18/2014 07:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
quoted
MIPS R6 changed the opcodes for LL/SC instructions and reduced the
offset field to 9-bits. This has some undesired effects with the "m"
constrain since it implies a 16-bit immediate. As a result of which,
add a register ("r") constrain as well to make sure the entire address
is loaded to a register before the LL/SC operations. Also use macro
to set the appropriate ISA for the asm blocks
Has support for MIPS R6 been added to GCC?

If so, that should include a proper constraint to be used with the new
offset restrictions.  We should probably use that, instead of forcing
to a "r" constraint.
quoted
Cc: Matthew Fortune <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <redacted>
---
  arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h
index 6dd6bfc607e9..8669e0ec97e3 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -60,13 +60,13 @@ static __inline__ void atomic_##op(int i, atomic_t * v)				\
  										\
  		do {								\
  			__asm__ __volatile__(					\
-			"	.set	arch=r4000			\n"	\
-			"	ll	%0, %1		# atomic_" #op "\n"	\
+			"	.set	"MIPS_ISA_ARCH_LEVEL"		\n"	\
+			"	ll	%0, 0(%3)	# atomic_" #op "\n"	\
  			"	" #asm_op " %0, %2			\n"	\
-			"	sc	%0, %1				\n"	\
+			"	sc	%0, 0(%3)			\n"	\
  			"	.set	mips0				\n"	\
  			: "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)			\
-			: "Ir" (i));						\
+			: "Ir" (i), "r" (&v->counter));				\
You lost the "m" constraint, but are still modifying memory.  There is
no "memory" clobber here, so we are no longer correctly describing
what is happening.
Rather than add a blanket "memory" clobber, it's better to keep the old
memory operand even if it is never used.  GCC will still assume it has
been modified.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans@mansr.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help