On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:40:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 04:40:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:23:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

Follow the pattern, please, I suppose
ti_pmic_tps68470.c

Would it work for you?

This is still a different driver from the tps68470 driver which is an MFD
driver. For clarity, I'd keep pmic as part of the name (and I'd use
tps68470_pmic_ prefix for internal symbols, too).

As PMICs are typically linked to the kernel (vs. being modules), there's no
issue with the module name. I would suppose few if any PMICs will be
compiled as modules in general.

It's not a big deal though. I'm fine either way.

Okay, let's agree on  tps68470_pmic for internal prefix and for file name?

Ack. Thanks!

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi	XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk