On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:23:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
Follow the pattern, please, I suppose
ti_pmic_tps68470.c
This pattern is weird. "ti" in front of the file name is redundant, and in
very few places the vendor prefix is used anyway. Especially when the chip
has a proper name --- as this one does.
I assume for the Intel PMICs it could be there for a couple of reasons which
are
1) lack of a clearly unique chip ID and
2) the use of common frameworklet for Intel PMICs.
There are also no other PMIC chips supported currently.
The pmic_tps68470 naming is in line with the GPIO driver (apart from the
dash / underscore difference).
Since
% git ls-files *pmic*
returns somewhat interesting results, I would even go further and use
tps68470.c here
and
s/ti_pmic/tps6840/g
inside the file.
Would it work for you?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko