Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-07 13:37:18
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+static int ti_tps68470_pmic_get_power(struct regmap *regmap, int reg, + int bitmask, u64 *value) +{ + int data;Shouldn't you use unsigned int here? Same in the functions below.
+1, regmap_read() returns unsigned int.
quoted
+static acpi_status ti_pmic_common_handler(u32 function,+ acpi_physical_address address, + u32 bits, u64 *value, + void *handler_context,
handler_context is unused.
quoted
+ int, int, u64 *), + int (*update)(struct regmap *, + int, int, u64), + struct ti_pmic_table *table, + int table_size)
I would even split this to have separate update() and get() paths instead of having such a monster of parameters.
quoted
+static acpi_status ti_pmic_clk_freq_handler(u32 function, + acpi_physical_address address, + u32 bits, u64 *value, + void *handler_context, + void *region_context) +{ + return ti_pmic_common_handler(function, address, bits, value, + handler_context, region_context, + ti_tps68470_pmic_get_clk_freq, + ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits, + (struct ti_pmic_table *) &clk_freq_table,You shouldn't use an explicit cast here. Instead make the function argument const as well and you're fine.
+1. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko