Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 8 authors, 2017-07-20

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver

From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-07 13:37:18
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+static int ti_tps68470_pmic_get_power(struct regmap *regmap, int reg,
+                                    int bitmask, u64 *value)
+{
+     int data;
Shouldn't you use unsigned int here? Same in the functions below.
+1, regmap_read() returns unsigned int.
quoted
+static acpi_status ti_pmic_common_handler(u32 function,
+                                       acpi_physical_address address,
+                                       u32 bits, u64 *value,
+                                       void *handler_context,
handler_context is unused.
quoted
+                                                  int, int, u64 *),
+                                       int (*update)(struct regmap *,
+                                                     int, int, u64),
+                                       struct ti_pmic_table *table,
+                                       int table_size)
I would even split this to have separate update() and get() paths
instead of having such a monster of parameters.
quoted
+static acpi_status ti_pmic_clk_freq_handler(u32 function,
+                                         acpi_physical_address address,
+                                         u32 bits, u64 *value,
+                                         void *handler_context,
+                                         void *region_context)
+{
+     return ti_pmic_common_handler(function, address, bits, value,
+                             handler_context, region_context,
+                             ti_tps68470_pmic_get_clk_freq,
+                             ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits,
+                             (struct ti_pmic_table *) &clk_freq_table,
You shouldn't use an explicit cast here. Instead make the function argument
const as well and you're fine.
+1.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help