Thread (283 messages) 283 messages, 37 authors, 2007-07-12

Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2007-07-03 10:31:07
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, lkml

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:38:48PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
quoted
FA_FL_DEALLOC		0x01 /* deallocate unwritten extent (default allocate) */
FA_FL_KEEP_SIZE	0x02 /* keep size for EOF {pre,de}alloc (default change size) */
FA_FL_DEL_DATA	0x04 /* delete existing data in alloc range (default keep) */
We now have two sets of flags - 
1) the above three with which I think no one has any issues with, and
Yes, I do.  FA_FL_DEL_DATA is plain stupid, a preallocation call should
never delete data.  FA_FL_DEALLOC should probably be a separate syscall
because it's very different functionality.

While we're at it I also dislike the FA_ prefix becuase it doesn't say
anything and is far too generic.  FALLOC_ is much better.
quoted
FA_FL_ERR_FREE	0x08 /* free preallocation on error (default keep prealloc) */
NACK on this one.  We should have just one behaviour, and from the thread
that not freeing the allocation on error.
quoted
FA_FL_NO_MTIME	0x10 /* keep same mtime (default change on size, data change) */
FA_FL_NO_CTIME	0x20 /* keep same ctime (default change on size, data change) */
NACK to these aswell.  If i_size changes c/mtime need updates, if the size
doesn't chamge they don't.  No need to add more flags for this.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help