Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2007-03-03 22:45:32
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2007-03-03 22:45:32
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Friday 02 March 2007 00:38:19 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
Forgive me if I haven't put enough thought into it, but would it be useful to create a generic_fallocate() that writes zeroed pages for any non-existent pages in the range? I don't know how glibc currently implements posix_fallocate(), but maybe the kernel could do it more efficiently, even in generic code. Maybe we don't care, since the major file systems can probably do something better in their own code.I'd be more happy to have the write out zeroes loop in glibc. And glibc needs to have it anyway, for older kernels.
A generic_fallocate makes sense to me iff we can do it in the kernel more significantly more efficiently than in glibc, e.g. by using only a single page in page cache instead of one for each page to be preallocated. If glibc is smart enough to do an optimal implementation, I fully agree with you. Arnd <><