Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
From: Eric Sandeen <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-02 15:16:30
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Eric Sandeen <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-02 15:16:30
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Amit K. Arora wrote:quoted
This is to give a heads up on few patches that we will be soon coming up with. These patches implement a new system call sys_fallocate() and a new inode operation "fallocate", for persistent preallocation. The new system call, as Andrew suggested, will look like: asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len);I am wondering about return values from this syscall ? Is it supposed to return the number of bytes allocated ? What about partial allocations ?
If you don't have enough blocks to cover the request, you should probably just return -ENOSPC, not a partial allocation.
What about if the blocks already exists ? What would be return values in those cases ?
0 on success, other normal errors oetherwise.. If asked for a range that includes already-allocated blocks, you just allocate any non-allocated blocks in the range, I think. -Eric