Thread (283 messages) 283 messages, 37 authors, 2007-07-12

Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()

From: Eric Sandeen <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-02 15:16:30
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Amit K. Arora wrote:
quoted
This is to give a heads up on few patches that we will be soon coming up
with. These patches implement a new system call sys_fallocate() and a
new inode operation "fallocate", for persistent preallocation. The new
system call, as Andrew suggested, will look like:

 asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len);
I am wondering about return values from this syscall ? Is it supposed to 
return the
number of bytes allocated ? What about partial allocations ? 
If you don't have enough blocks to cover the request, you should 
probably just return -ENOSPC, not a partial allocation.
What about 
if the
blocks already exists ? What would be return values in those cases ?
0 on success, other normal errors oetherwise..

If asked for a range that includes already-allocated blocks, you just 
allocate any non-allocated blocks in the range, I think.

-Eric
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help