Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2007-03-06 14:45:04
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Tue 06-03-07 06:36:09, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
fallocate with the whence argument and flags is already quite complicated, I'd rather have another call for placement decisions, that would be called on an fd to do placement decissions for any further allocations (prealloc, write, etc)Yes, posix_fallocate shouldn't be made more complicated. But I don't understand why requesting linear layout of the blocks should be an option. It's always an advantage if the blocks requested this way are linear on disk. So, the kernel should always do its best to make this happen, without needing an additional option.
Actually, it's not that simple. You want linear layout of blocks you are going to read. That is not necessary a linear layout of blocks in a single file - trace sometime a start of some complicated app like KDE. You find it's seeking like a hell because it needs a few blocks from a ton of distinct files (shared libs, config files, etc). As these files are mostly read only, it's advantageous to interleave them on disk or at least keep them close. Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SuSE CR Labs