Thread (74 messages) flat view 74 messages, 4 authors, 2003-06-13

RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing

From: Daryl Van Vorst <hidden>
Date: 2003-06-12 18:49:55

Max,
If an application does not explicitly tell us that it 
supports larger MTU then it does not support it. As simple as 
that :). We don't play "guess what MTU I support" games ;-). 
Yup.
Sure we can make a hack. Once we agree on how should we 
handle it I'll make 
the change. But if the hack affects general case we're not 
going to put it 
into official kernel.
Of course. :)
quoted
Apparently, in step 3 above, if we send a config request with no 
options it will also pass the test. How silly is that? (specially 
considering that's what we send by default in the first place!)
I'm pretty sure that it's just because they use some dumb 
tester implementation. It doesn't make sense to resend the 
same config request.
It's actually written that way in the test case. Here's a quote from the
updated test case (errata correction ID 241):

"Pass Verdict: The IUT sends an L2CAP_ConfigReq with acceptable values
received in the L2CAP_ConfigRsp with Result = Failure - unacceptable
parameters, or the L2CAP_ConfigReq contains no options."

-Daryl.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help