RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing
From: Daryl Van Vorst <hidden>
Date: 2003-06-12 18:49:55
Max,
If an application does not explicitly tell us that it supports larger MTU then it does not support it. As simple as that :). We don't play "guess what MTU I support" games ;-).
Yup.
Sure we can make a hack. Once we agree on how should we handle it I'll make the change. But if the hack affects general case we're not going to put it into official kernel.
Of course. :)
quoted
Apparently, in step 3 above, if we send a config request with no options it will also pass the test. How silly is that? (specially considering that's what we send by default in the first place!)I'm pretty sure that it's just because they use some dumb tester implementation. It doesn't make sense to resend the same config request.
It's actually written that way in the test case. Here's a quote from the updated test case (errata correction ID 241): "Pass Verdict: The IUT sends an L2CAP_ConfigReq with acceptable values received in the L2CAP_ConfigRsp with Result = Failure - unacceptable parameters, or the L2CAP_ConfigReq contains no options." -Daryl.