RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing

quoted

So how about we do this:  As above, if it exists then we 

close it. If 

quoted

not, we log an error.

the proposal from Cetecom makes no sense.

If you have one channel with correct data and you get a wrong 
packet which was for another channel, but the CID is corrupt 
and show now the value of the correct channel. You will 
infect a correct working channel with a false packet.

The main problem is that wrong packets should not arrive at 
the L2CAP layer. If they do and we decect them (like a length 
mismatch), we have to close down all channels and remove the 
infected ACL link.

Max, what do you think? This way is a little bit radical, but 
I think it is an acceptable way of handling these errors. And 
with this method we will pass this test.

I like it.  If the other end is that screwed up we should get rid of it
completely.

-Daryl.