RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing
From: Marcel Holtmann <hidden>
Date: 2003-05-09 00:10:07
Hi Daryl,
Have a look at the rfcomm_recv_rpn() function pasted below. I did a diff between it and the latest, and the only difference is how a variable is declared - nothing significant. Here's what I see happening: Take a look at XON and XOFF. If we see a value we don't like, we set rpn->xon_char to the value that we would like to see. We also update the rpn_mask variable. Then at the bottom of the function we call rfcomm_send_rpn() with xon_char and not rpn->xon_char. So it sends 0 instead of the desired character, but it does send the correct rpn_mask. It looks to me like most of the tests act on the right variables. Just xon, xoff, and flow control appear to have the problem. Do you agree?
it seems that you are right. I have a fix for this in my repository. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel