Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 5 authors, 2021-10-07

Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die

From: Barry Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-05 20:43:38
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml
Subsystem: driver core, kobjects, debugfs and sysfs, generic architecture topology, the rest · Maintainers: Greg Kroah-Hartman, "Rafael J. Wysocki", Danilo Krummrich, Sudeep Holla, Linus Torvalds

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:34 AM Valentin Schneider
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 24/09/21 20:51, Barry Song wrote:
quoted
 void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
 {
      struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
@@ -617,6 +622,11 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
              if (cpuid_topo->package_id != cpu_topo->package_id)
                      continue;

+             if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id == cpu_topo->cluster_id) {
+                     cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->cluster_sibling);
+                     cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->cluster_sibling);
+             }
+
Hm so without cluster information (e.g. DT system), we have
->cluster_id=-1, we'll essentially copy the package mask into the cluster
mask.

The exposed cluster mask is still <= package mask which is sensible. Are we
fine with that, or do we need/want the mask to be empty in the -1 case? I'm
guessing userspace tools should check for either id!=-1 or if the exclusive
disjucntion of cluster vs package masks is non-empty.
Hi Valentin,
Yep, this is a very good question. I'd like change the code to:
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index 7cb31d959f33..fc0836f460fb 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -622,7 +622,8 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
                if (cpuid_topo->package_id != cpu_topo->package_id)
                        continue;

-               if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id == cpu_topo->cluster_id) {
+               if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id == cpu_topo->cluster_id &&
+                   cpuid_topo->cluster_id != -1) {
                        cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->cluster_sibling);
                        cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->cluster_sibling);
                }
This should be consistent with Tim's patch3/3 for x86 in case
id is BAD_APICID:
static bool match_l2c(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
{
        ...
        /* Do not match if we do not have a valid APICID for cpu: */
        if (per_cpu(cpu_l2c_id, cpu1) == BAD_APICID)
                return false;
        ...
}

Thanks
Barry

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help