Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Represent cluster topology and enable load balance between clusters
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-10-01 14:58:11
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-10-01 14:58:11
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:39:56PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Hi Barry, On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:32, Barry Song [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Vincent, Dietmar, Peter, Ingo, Do you have any comment on this first series which exposes cluster topology of ARM64 kunpeng 920 & x86 Jacobsville and supports load balance only for the 1st stage? I will be very grateful for your comments so that things can move forward in the right direction. I think Tim also looks forward to bringing up cluster support in Jacobsville.This patchset makes sense to me and the addition of a new scheduling level to better reflect the HW topology goes in the right direction.
So I had a look, dreading the selecti-idle-sibling changes, and was pleasantly surprised they're gone :-) As is, this does indeed look like something mergable without too much hassle. The one questino I have is, do we want default y? The one nit I have is the Kconfig text, I'm not really sure that's clarifying what a cluster is. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel