Re: [PATCH 15/16] arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-05-21 18:37:16
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-renesas-soc, linux-serial, lkml
Hi Geert, Thank you for the review. On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:35 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Prabhakar, On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:24 PM Lad Prabhakar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's. File structure: r9a07g044.dtsi => RZ/G2L family SoC common parts r9a07g044l.dtsi => Specific to RZ/G2L (R9A07G044L) SoC r9a07g044l1.dtsi => Specific to RZ/G2L (R9A07G044L single cortex A55) SoC r9a07g044l2.dtsi => Specific to RZ/G2L (R9A07G044L dual cortex A55) SoC Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>Thanks for your patch!quoted
index 000000000000..c625d302f889--- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0Do we want to use SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) for new DTS files? This actually also applies to <dt-bindings/...> files.quoted
+/* + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC common SoC parts + * + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. + */ + +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g044l-cpg.h> + +/ { + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + + extal_clk: extal { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + #clock-cells = <0>; + /* This value must be overridden by the board */ + clock-frequency = <0>; + }; + + psci { + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0", "arm,psci-0.2"; + method = "smc"; + }; + + soc: soc { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + + scif0: serial@1004b800 { + compatible = "renesas,scif-r9a07g044"; + reg = <0 0x1004b800 0 0x400>; + interrupts = + <GIC_SPI 380 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, + <GIC_SPI 382 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, + <GIC_SPI 383 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, + <GIC_SPI 381 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, + <GIC_SPI 384 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;"make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml": arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dt.yaml: serial@1004b800: interrupts: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: [[0, 380, 4], [0, 382, 4], [0, 383, 4], [0, 381, 4], [0, 384, 4]] is too long Additional items are not allowed ([0, 382, 4], [0, 383, 4], [0, 381, 4], [0, 384, 4] were unexpected) Additional items are not allowed ([0, 384, 4] was unexpected) [[0, 380, 4], [0, 382, 4], [0, 383, 4], [0, 381, 4], [0, 384, 4]] is too short One interrupt is missing. According to the documentation, "tei" and "dri" share an interrupt, so they should map to the same interrupt number. Please add interrupt-names.
Agreed will do.
quoted
+ clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G044_CLK_SCIF0>; + clock-names = "fck"; + power-domains = <&cpg>; + resets = <&cpg R9A07G044_CLK_SCIF0>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + devid: chipid@11020a04 { + compatible = "renesas,devid"; + reg = <0 0x11020a04 0 4>; + }; + + gic: interrupt-controller@11900000 { + compatible = "arm,gic-v3"; + #interrupt-cells = <3>; + #address-cells = <0>; + interrupt-controller; + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>, + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>; + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G044_CLK_GIC600>; + clock-names = "gic6000";This looks like a weird name ;-) In addition, it should be the consumer clock name, not the provider clock name.
Agreed will rename that.
quoted
+ power-domains = <&cpg>; + resets = <&cpg R9A07G044_CLK_GIC600>;"make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.yaml": arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dt.yaml: interrupt-controller@11900000: 'clock-names', 'clocks', 'power-domains', 'resets' do not match any of the regexes: '^(msi-controller|gic-its|interrupt-controller)@[0-9a-f]+$', '^gic-its@', '^interrupt-controller@[0-9a-f]+$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' These properties should be added to the GIC-v3 bindings, cfr. the normal GIC bindings.
Agreed will do that.
quoted
+ }; + }; +};diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..8d396b9100c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L common SoC parts + * + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. + */ + +/dts-v1/; +#include "r9a07g044.dtsi" + +&soc { + cpg: clock-controller@11010000 { + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044l-cpg"; + reg = <0 0x11010000 0 0x10000>; + clocks = <&extal_clk>; + clock-names = "extal"; + #clock-cells = <2>; + #reset-cells = <1>; + #power-domain-cells = <0>; + };As I think this is shared by RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC, it belongs to r9a07g044.dtsi.
As some of the IP blocks present on RZ/G2L aren't present in RZ/G2LC the clocks for the IP will be missing hence this is added to SoC specific dtsi.
quoted
+};diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..44d4504e44c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L R9A07G044L1 common parts + * + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. + */ + +/dts-v1/; +#include "r9a07g044l.dtsi" + +/ { + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044l1"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>;#{address,size}-cells already defined in r9a07g044.dtsi.
Will drop that.
quoted
+ + cpus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + a55_0: cpu@0 { + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + reg = <0>; + device_type = "cpu"; + next-level-cache = <&L3_CA55>; + enable-method = "psci"; + }; + + L3_CA55: cache-controller-0 { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x40000>; + };I think the first CPU core should be in the base r9a07g044.dtsi file.
OK will move that.
quoted
+ }; + + timer { + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; + interrupts-extended = + <&gic GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <&gic GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <&gic GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <&gic GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;Also in the base file, with interrupts-extended overridden where needed?
OK will override here with the timer node moved from r9a07g044l2.dtsi to common SoC file.
quoted
+ }; +};diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..33bb35e1c369 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L R9A07G044L2 common parts + * + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. + */ + +/dts-v1/; +#include "r9a07g044l.dtsi" + +/ { + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044l2"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + + cpus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + cpu-map { + cluster0 { + core0 { + cpu = <&a55_0>; + }; + core1 { + cpu = <&a55_1>; + }; + }; + }; + + a55_0: cpu@0 { + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + reg = <0>; + device_type = "cpu"; + next-level-cache = <&L3_CA55>; + enable-method = "psci"; + }; + + a55_1: cpu@1 { + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + reg = <0x100>; + device_type = "cpu"; + next-level-cache = <&L3_CA55>; + enable-method = "psci"; + }; + + L3_CA55: cache-controller-0 { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-unified; + cache-size = <0x40000>; + };I think (at least) the first CPU core should be in the base r9a07g044.dtsi file. Probably the second CPU core should be in the base file, too, and removed by /delete-node/ in r9a07g044l1.dtsi?
Agreed will do that.
quoted
+ }; + + timer { + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; + interrupts-extended = + <&gic GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <&gic GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <&gic GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <&gic GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; + };Also in the base file, with interrupts-extended overridden where needed?
Will move this node to common SoC r9a07g044.dtsi file and override in r9a07g044l1.dtsi with CPU maks to 1. Cheers, Prabhakar
quoted
+}; -- 2.17.1-- Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel