Hi Prabhakar,
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:23 PM Lad Prabhakar
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Document R9A07G044 SoC variants, common compatiable string
"renesas,scif-r9a07g044" is added for RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC SoC.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch!
quoted
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
@@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ properties:
- const: renesas,rcar-gen3-scif # R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2
- const: renesas,scif # generic SCIF compatible UART
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - renesas,scif-r9a07g044 # RZ/G2{L,LC}
+
reg:
maxItems: 1
Looks good to me.
Do interrupts and interrupt-names need to be updated?
The SCIF node added in "[PATCH 15/16] arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial
DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's" has 5 interrupts, while the bindings
support only 1, 4, or 6 interrupts.
According to the SoC interrupt mapping, "tei" and "dri" share an
interrupt, so 6 interrupts is correct, and this part of the binding
does not need an update.
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel