Hi Prabhakar,

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:23 PM Lad Prabhakar
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Document R9A07G044 SoC variants, common compatiable string
"renesas,scif-r9a07g044" is added for RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC SoC.

Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

quoted

--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml

@@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ properties:
           - const: renesas,rcar-gen3-scif # R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2
           - const: renesas,scif           # generic SCIF compatible UART

+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - renesas,scif-r9a07g044      # RZ/G2{L,LC}
+
   reg:
     maxItems: 1

Looks good to me.

Do interrupts and interrupt-names need to be updated?
The SCIF node added in "[PATCH 15/16] arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial
DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's" has 5 interrupts, while the bindings
support only 1, 4, or 6 interrupts.

According to the SoC interrupt mapping, "tei" and "dri" share an
interrupt, so 6 interrupts is correct, and this part of the binding
does not need an update.

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel