Hi Geert,

Thank you for the review.

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:25 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Prabhakar,

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:23 PM Lad Prabhakar
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add ARCH_R9A07G044{L,LC} as a configuration symbol for the new Renesas
RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's.

Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

quoted

--- a/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig

@@ -279,6 +279,16 @@ config ARCH_R8A774B1
        help
          This enables support for the Renesas RZ/G2N SoC.

+config ARCH_R9A07G044L
+       bool "ARM64 Platform support for RZ/G2L SoC"

Please drop the "SoC", for consistency with other entries.

Oops will do that.

quoted

+       help
+         This enables support for the Renesas RZ/G2L SoC.
+
+config ARCH_R9A07G044LC
+       bool "ARM64 Platform support for RZ/G2LC SoC"

Likewise.

will do.

quoted

+       help
+         This enables support for the Renesas RZ/G2LC SoC.
+
 endif # ARM64

Given LSI DEVID is the same, do we need both, or can we do with a
single ARCH_R9A07G044?

The reason behind adding separate configs was in case if we wanted to
just build an image for RZ/G2L and not RZ/G2LC this would increase
image size and also build unneeded dtb's.

Cheers,
Prabhakar

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel