RE: [PATCHv9 10/12] PCI: mobiveil: Add PCIe Gen4 RC driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs
From: "Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>
Date: 2020-02-06 13:46:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
Hi Andrew, Thanks a lot for your comments!
-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Murray <redacted> Sent: 2020年1月13日 20:03 To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; mark.rutland@arm.com; l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in; shawnguo@kernel.org; m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in; Leo Li [off-list ref]; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will.deacon@arm.com; Mingkai Hu [off-list ref]; M.h. Lian [off-list ref]; Xiaowei Bao [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 10/12] PCI: mobiveil: Add PCIe Gen4 RC driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:46:23AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote:quoted
From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> This PCIe controller is based on the Mobiveil GPEX IP, which is compatible with the PCI Express™ Base Specification, Revision 4.0. Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@nxp.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile | 1 + .../mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c | 274++++++++++++++++++quoted
.../pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h | 16 +- 4 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.cdiff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfigb/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig index 64343c07bfed..c823be8dab1c 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig@@ -21,4 +21,14 @@ config PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT Soft IP. It has up to 8 outbound and inbound windows for address translation and it is a PCIe Gen4 IP. +config PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4 + bool "Freescale Layerscape PCIe Gen4 controller" + depends on PCI + depends on OF && (ARM64 || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) + depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN + select PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST + help + Say Y here if you want PCIe Gen4 controller support on + Layerscape SoCs. The PCIe controller can work in RC or + EP mode according to RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] setting.I think you can remove the last sentence - it doesn't give any value to users of KConfig.
OK, will remove it in v10.
quoted
endmenudiff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefileb/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile index 9fb6d1c6504d..99d879de32d6 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL) += pcie-mobiveil.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST) += pcie-mobiveil-host.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT) += pcie-mobiveil-plat.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4) += pcie-layerscape-gen4.odiff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.cb/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6c0d3e2532db--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * PCIe Gen4 host controller driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs + * + * Copyright 2019 NXP + * + * Author: Zhiqiang Hou <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> */ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/of_pci.h> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/resource.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> + +#include "pcie-mobiveil.h" + +/* LUT and PF control registers */ +#define PCIE_LUT_OFF 0x80000 +#define PCIE_PF_OFF 0xc0000 +#define PCIE_PF_INT_STAT 0x18 +#define PF_INT_STAT_PABRST BIT(31) + +#define PCIE_PF_DBG 0x7fc +#define PF_DBG_LTSSM_MASK 0x3f +#define PF_DBG_LTSSM_L0 0x2d /* L0 state */ +#define PF_DBG_WE BIT(31) +#define PF_DBG_PABR BIT(27) + +#define to_ls_pcie_g4(x) platform_get_drvdata((x)->pdev) + +struct ls_pcie_g4 { + struct mobiveil_pcie pci; + struct delayed_work dwork; + int irq; +}; + +static inline u32 ls_pcie_g4_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, u32 +off) { + return ioread32(pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_LUT_OFF + off); +} + +static inline void ls_pcie_g4_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, + u32 off, u32 val) +{ + iowrite32(val, pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_LUT_OFF + off); } + +static inline u32 ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, u32 +off) { + return ioread32(pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_PF_OFF + off); } + +static inline void ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, + u32 off, u32 val) +{ + iowrite32(val, pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_PF_OFF + off); } + +static bool ls_pcie_g4_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) { + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; + u32 header_type; + + header_type = mobiveil_csr_readb(mv_pci, PCI_HEADER_TYPE); + header_type &= 0x7f; + + return header_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE; } + +static int ls_pcie_g4_link_up(struct mobiveil_pcie *pci) { + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = to_ls_pcie_g4(pci); + u32 state; + + state = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); + state = state & PF_DBG_LTSSM_MASK; + + if (state == PF_DBG_LTSSM_L0) + return 1; + + return 0; +} + +static void ls_pcie_g4_disable_interrupt(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) { + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; + + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, 0, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB); } + +static void ls_pcie_g4_enable_interrupt(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) { + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; + u32 val; + + /* Clear the interrupt status */ + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, 0xffffffff, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT); + + val = PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK | PAB_INTP_MSI | PAB_INTP_RESET | + PAB_INTP_PCIE_UE | PAB_INTP_IE_PMREDI | PAB_INTP_IE_EC; + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, val, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB); } + +static void ls_pcie_g4_reinit_hw(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) { + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; + struct device *dev = &mv_pci->pdev->dev; + u32 val, act_stat; + int to = 100; + + /* Poll for pab_csb_reset to set and PAB activity to clear */ + do { + usleep_range(10, 15); + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_INT_STAT); + act_stat = mobiveil_csr_readl(mv_pci, PAB_ACTIVITY_STAT); + } while (((val & PF_INT_STAT_PABRST) == 0 || act_stat) && to--); + if (to < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Poll PABRST&PABACT timeout\n"); + return;If a timeout happens here - the caller has no idea this has happened and yet the following work doesn't get done. Isn't this a problem?
Will change the return value type to 'int' in v10, so that the caller can know the fail.
quoted
+ } + + /* clear PEX_RESET bit in PEX_PF0_DBG register */ + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); + val |= PF_DBG_WE; + ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG, val); + + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); + val |= PF_DBG_PABR; + ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG, val); + + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); + val &= ~PF_DBG_WE; + ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG, val); + + mobiveil_host_init(mv_pci, true);Can mobiveil_host_init fail?
It should not fail, only register programming operations were left in this function.
quoted
+ + to = 100; + while (!ls_pcie_g4_link_up(mv_pci) && to--) + usleep_range(200, 250); + if (to < 0) + dev_err(dev, "PCIe link training timeout\n"); } + +static irqreturn_t ls_pcie_g4_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) { + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = (struct ls_pcie_g4 *)dev_id; + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; + u32 val; + + val = mobiveil_csr_readl(mv_pci, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT); + if (!val) + return IRQ_NONE; + + if (val & PAB_INTP_RESET) {Can you explain why this is needed (perhaps also in the cover letter)?
The hot reset will result in the RC crash, so need the ISR to reset the RC.
quoted
+ ls_pcie_g4_disable_interrupt(pcie); + schedule_delayed_work(&pcie->dwork, msecs_to_jiffies(1)); + } + + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, val, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT); + + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + +static int ls_pcie_g4_interrupt_init(struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci) { + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = to_ls_pcie_g4(mv_pci); + struct platform_device *pdev = mv_pci->pdev; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int ret; + + pcie->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "intr"); + if (pcie->irq < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Can't get 'intr' IRQ, errno = %d\n", pcie->irq); + return pcie->irq; + } + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pcie->irq, ls_pcie_g4_isr, + IRQF_SHARED, pdev->name, pcie); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Can't register PCIe IRQ, errno = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + +static void ls_pcie_g4_reset(struct work_struct *work) { + struct delayed_work *dwork = container_of(work, struct delayed_work, + work); + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = container_of(dwork, struct ls_pcie_g4, dwork); + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; + u16 ctrl; + + ctrl = mobiveil_csr_readw(mv_pci, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL); + ctrl &= ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET; + mobiveil_csr_writew(mv_pci, ctrl, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL); + ls_pcie_g4_reinit_hw(pcie); + ls_pcie_g4_enable_interrupt(pcie); +} + +static struct mobiveil_rp_ops ls_pcie_g4_rp_ops = { + .interrupt_init = ls_pcie_g4_interrupt_init, }; + +static const struct mobiveil_pab_ops ls_pcie_g4_pab_ops = { + .link_up = ls_pcie_g4_link_up, +}; + +static int __init ls_pcie_g4_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci; + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + int ret; + + if (!of_parse_phandle(np, "msi-parent", 0)) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to find msi-parent\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(*pcie)); + if (!bridge) + return -ENOMEM; + + pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge); + mv_pci = &pcie->pci; + + mv_pci->pdev = pdev; + mv_pci->ops = &ls_pcie_g4_pab_ops; + mv_pci->rp.ops = &ls_pcie_g4_rp_ops; + mv_pci->rp.bridge = bridge; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie); + + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&pcie->dwork, ls_pcie_g4_reset); + + ret = mobiveil_pcie_host_probe(mv_pci); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Fail to probe\n"); + return ret; + } + + if (!ls_pcie_g4_is_bridge(pcie))Is this a check that could apply to all host bridge drivers and thus live in mobiveil_pcie_host_probe?
Yes, will do in v10.
quoted
+ return -ENODEV; + + ls_pcie_g4_enable_interrupt(pcie);Is there an issue here in that we enable interrupts *after* telling the kernel about our controller? (Same applies for bailing if the IP isn't a bridge).
Andrew, I don't understand the issue, can you help to explain? Thanks, Zhiqiang
Thanks, Andrew Murrayquoted
+ + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_g4_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-pcie", }, + { }, +}; + +static struct platform_driver ls_pcie_g4_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "layerscape-pcie-gen4", + .of_match_table = ls_pcie_g4_of_match, + .suppress_bind_attrs = true, + }, +}; + +builtin_platform_driver_probe(ls_pcie_g4_driver, ls_pcie_g4_probe);diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.hb/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h index 750a7fd95bc1..c57a68d2bac4 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ #define PAGE_LO_MASK 0x3ff #define PAGE_SEL_OFFSET_SHIFT 10 +#define PAB_ACTIVITY_STAT 0x81c + #define PAB_AXI_PIO_CTRL 0x0840 #define APIO_EN_MASK 0xf@@ -51,8 +53,18 @@ #define PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB 0x0b0c #define PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT 0x0b1c -#define PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK 0x01e0 -#define PAB_INTP_MSI_MASK 0x8 +#define PAB_INTP_RESET BIT(1) +#define PAB_INTP_MSI BIT(3) +#define PAB_INTP_INTA BIT(5) +#define PAB_INTP_INTB BIT(6) +#define PAB_INTP_INTC BIT(7) +#define PAB_INTP_INTD BIT(8) +#define PAB_INTP_PCIE_UE BIT(9) +#define PAB_INTP_IE_PMREDI BIT(29) +#define PAB_INTP_IE_EC BIT(30) +#define PAB_INTP_MSI_MASK PAB_INTP_MSI +#define PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK (PAB_INTP_INTA |PAB_INTP_INTB |\quoted
+ PAB_INTP_INTC | PAB_INTP_INTD) #define PAB_AXI_AMAP_CTRL(win) PAB_REG_ADDR(0x0ba0,win)quoted
#define WIN_ENABLE_SHIFT 0 -- 2.17.1
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel