RE: [PATCHv9 06/12] PCI: mobiveil: Add callback function for link up check
From: "Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>
Date: 2020-02-06 13:25:32
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
Hi Andrew, Thanks a lot for your review! B.R, Zhiqiang
-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Murray <redacted> Sent: 2020年1月13日 19:22 To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; mark.rutland@arm.com; l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in; shawnguo@kernel.org; m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in; Leo Li [off-list ref]; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will.deacon@arm.com; Mingkai Hu [off-list ref]; M.h. Lian [off-list ref]; Xiaowei Bao [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 06/12] PCI: mobiveil: Add callback function for link up check On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:45:57AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote:quoted
From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> The platforms, in which the Mobiveil GPEX is integrated, may have their specific mechanism to check link up status. This patch is to enable these platforms to implement theirs. Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> --- V9: - New patch splited from the #1 of V8 patches to make it easy to review. drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.c | 3 +++ drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.cb/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.c index 2773f823c9ea..b9ed2d95641c 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.c@@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ void mobiveil_csr_write(struct mobiveil_pcie*pcie, u32 val, u32 off, bool mobiveil_pcie_link_up(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie) { + if (pcie->ops->link_up) + return pcie->ops->link_up(pcie); + return (mobiveil_csr_readl(pcie, LTSSM_STATUS) & LTSSM_STATUS_L0_MASK) == LTSSM_STATUS_L0;On the previous patch I suggested that we don't mix up the link_up logic with the logic that decides which function to call. In this case the link_up logic is trivial. So this is probably OK. Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <redacted>quoted
}diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.hb/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h index 18d85806a7fc..95d2e7c809b8 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h@@ -148,6 +148,10 @@ struct root_port { struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; }; +struct mobiveil_pab_ops { + int (*link_up)(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie); }; + struct mobiveil_pcie { struct platform_device *pdev; void __iomem *csr_axi_slave_base; /* root port config base */@@ -157,6 +161,7 @@ struct mobiveil_pcie { int ppio_wins; int ob_wins_configured; /* configured outbound windows */ int ib_wins_configured; /* configured inbound windows */ + const struct mobiveil_pab_ops *ops; struct root_port rp; }; --2.17.1
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel