[PATCH v9 1/4] syscalls: Verify address limit before returning to user-mode
From: luto@kernel.org (Andy Lutomirski)
Date: 2017-05-12 23:16:22
Also in:
linux-api, linux-s390, lkml
From: luto@kernel.org (Andy Lutomirski)
Date: 2017-05-12 23:16:22
Also in:
linux-api, linux-s390, lkml
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:06:35PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:quoted
I think Kees might be talking about https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=822, fixed in commit e6978e4bf181fb3b5f8cb6f71b4fe30fbf1b655c. The issue was that perf code that can run in pretty much any context called access_ok().And that commit has *NOT* solved the problem. perf_callchain_user() can be called synchronously, without passing through that code. Tracepoint shite... That set_fs() should be done in get_perf_callchain(), just around the call of perf_callchain_user(). Along with pagefault_disable(), actually.
Even that's not quite enough because of a different issue: perf nmis can hit during scheduling or when we're in lazy mm, leading to the entirely wrong set of page tables being used. We need nmi_uaccess_begin() and nmi_uaccess_end(), and the former needs to be allowed to fail. AFAIK this isn't presently a security problem because it mainly affects kernel threads, and you need to be root to profile them, but maybe there's some race where it does matter.