[kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] syscalls: Verify address limit before returning to user-mode
From: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk (Al Viro)
Date: 2017-05-10 02:47:18
Also in:
linux-api, linux-s390, lkml
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 03:11:18AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:03:22AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:02:50AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:00:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:quoted
fs/splice.c has some, ahem, interesting uses that have been the source of nasty exploits in the past. Converting them to use iov_iter properly would be really, really nice. Christoph, I don't suppose you'd like to do that?I can take care of all the fs code including this one.Oh?quoted
I spent the afternoon hacking up where I'd like this to head. It's completely untested as of now: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/vfs.git/shortlog/refs/heads/setfs-eliminationAnd just what happens to driver that has no ->read_iter()? Unless I'm seriously misreading that, NAK with extreme prejudice.
FWIW, some parts of that queue are obviously sane; it's the conversions of kernel_write() and friends to ->read_iter/->write_iter() that are non-starters. That stuff is used in too many situations; we can't guarantee that all of them will be for files that have those. As for default_file_splice_read(), I seriously suspect that with your change we could as well just make it return -EINVAL and be done with that; places that have ->read_iter() tend to have explicit ->splice_read() and it looks like the ones that do not should simply use generic_file_read_iter(). I hadn't checked that, but there's not a lot of those: arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c:437: .read_iter = hypfs_read_iter, drivers/char/mem.c:798: .read_iter = read_iter_null, drivers/char/mem.c:813: .read_iter = read_iter_zero, drivers/char/mem.c:824: .read_iter = read_iter_zero, drivers/char/raw.c:286: .read_iter = blkdev_read_iter, drivers/net/tap.c:1134: .read_iter = tap_read_iter, drivers/net/tun.c:2423: .read_iter = tun_chr_read_iter, drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c:1255: .read_iter = ffs_epfile_read_iter, drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/inode.c:703: .read_iter = ep_read_iter, drivers/vhost/net.c:1252: .read_iter = vhost_net_chr_read_iter, fs/9p/vfs_file.c:641: .read_iter = generic_file_read_iter, fs/9p/vfs_file.c:652: .read_iter = generic_file_read_iter, fs/9p/vfs_file.c:664: .read_iter = v9fs_file_read_iter, fs/9p/vfs_file.c:675: .read_iter = v9fs_file_read_iter, fs/9p/vfs_file.c:687: .read_iter = v9fs_mmap_file_read_iter, fs/9p/vfs_file.c:698: .read_iter = v9fs_mmap_file_read_iter, fs/fuse/cuse.c:180: .read_iter = cuse_read_iter, fs/fuse/file.c:3015: .read_iter = fuse_direct_read_iter, fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:980: .read_iter = hugetlbfs_read_iter, fs/ncpfs/file.c:248: .read_iter = ncp_file_read_iter, fs/orangefs/file.c:742: .read_iter = orangefs_file_read_iter, fs/pipe.c:1011: .read_iter = pipe_read, sound/core/pcm_native.c:3696: .read_iter = snd_pcm_readv, is the full list and I'm fairly certain that most of them will work with generic_file_splice_read() just fine. drivers/char definitely will, so will ncpfs/orangefs/hugetlbfs/most of 9p ones (two of the latter might need some care in p9_client_read(), but that should be doable easily enough). pipe is irrelevant (->splice_read() won't be called for those). fuse ones should be doable, but that might take a bit more infrastructure work in lib/iov_iter.c. vhost, gadgetfs, tun/tap - no idea at the moment.