Thread (156 messages) 156 messages, 25 authors, 2015-01-30

[Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 06/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2015-01-20 15:11:12
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:26:57PM +0000, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
On 20.01.2015 12:00, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:39:16AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
quoted
On 2015?01?19? 18:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 06:25:53AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
quoted
On 2015?01?16? 17:49, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:04:54PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
quoted
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
     *
     */

+#include <linux/acpi.h>
    #include <linux/init.h>
    #include <linux/io.h>
    #include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -68,3 +69,30 @@ void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
    	bus->domain_nr = domain;
    }
    #endif
+
+/*
+ * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access.
+ *
+ * Default empty implementation.  Replace with an architecture-specific setup
+ * routine, if necessary.
+ */
+int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+		  unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+		unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+/* Root bridge scanning */
+struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
+{
+	/* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
[...]
quoted
quoted
When PCI is enabled and the above functions are compiled in, do they
need to return any useful data or just -EINVAL. Are they ever called?
They will be called if PCI root bridge is defined in DSDT, should I
print some warning message before it is implemented?
My point: do they need to return real data when a PCI root bridge is
defined in DSDT or you always expect them to always return some -E*? Can
you explain why?
Not always return -E* or NULL;

For raw_pci_read/write(), they are needed to access the PCI config space
before the PCI root bus is created. so they will return 0 if access to
PCI config space is ok; pci_acpi_scan_root() will return root bus
pointer if it is successfully created.
OK. So what's the plan for implementing these functions properly. For
the raw_pci_read/write, the comment states "replace with an
architecture-specific setup routine". What does this mean?
raw_pci_read/write will use MMCONFIG code to access PCI config space. 
Please see my patch set:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1411.2/02753.html
which is going to refactor the x86 specific code so it would be usable 
for ARM64 too.
OK. Thanks for the information.

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help