Thread (156 messages) 156 messages, 25 authors, 2015-01-30

[PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

From: Jason Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-15 20:05:20
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
quoted
quoted
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
for v3.20?
quoted
Before you even ask for this, please look at the patches and realise
that there is a complete lack of Reviewed-by tags on the code (well,
apart from trivial Kconfig changes). In addition, the series touches on
other subsystems like clocksource, irqchip, acpi and I don't see any
acks from the corresponding maintainers. So even if I wanted to merge
the series, there is no way it can be done without additional
reviews/acks. On the document (last patch), I'd like to see a statement
There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with
subject lines in the form "ARM / ACPI:" so people could be forgiven for
just not even reading the e-mails enough to notice changes to their
subsystems.  Is it worth posting those patches separately more directly
to the relevant maintainers?
I think it's beneficial to post the entire series as one thread, but to
change the subject line of each patch to adequately reflect the affected
subsystem.

thx,

Jason.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help