Thread (156 messages) 156 messages, 25 authors, 2015-01-30

[Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI

From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-28 20:37:56
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Timur Tabi [off-list ref] wrote:
What is the reason to assume that DT is preferred over ACPI?  I would
have thought that if ACPI is present, then it means we're on an ARM64
server platform, and therefore it should be used.  It seems silly to
require acpi=force on every ARM64 server platform.
So it looks like there's a whole conversation about this already in
this thread that I didn't notice.  However, reading through all of it,
I still don't understand sure why the presence of ACPI tables is
insufficient to enable ACPI.  In what situation would we want to
ignore ACPI tables that are present?

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help