[Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-28 20:37:56
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-28 20:37:56
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Timur Tabi [off-list ref] wrote:
What is the reason to assume that DT is preferred over ACPI? I would have thought that if ACPI is present, then it means we're on an ARM64 server platform, and therefore it should be used. It seems silly to require acpi=force on every ARM64 server platform.
So it looks like there's a whole conversation about this already in this thread that I didn't notice. However, reading through all of it, I still don't understand sure why the presence of ACPI tables is insufficient to enable ACPI. In what situation would we want to ignore ACPI tables that are present? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.