On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:23:58PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 15 August 2013 23:18, Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
But doesn't that mean that there is _currently_ no problem ? If so,
we can introduce the additional code when the problem really shows up.
Being Preemptive is good, but if it is not really needed today
I would rather have today's problems resolved and bother about tomorrow's
when they show up.
Conceptually the two parts go together: rely on correct
irq routing, tell qemu we rely on correct irq routing.
It's only one extra line...
Possibly, but the lack of progress suggests that by tying both parts
together we might get neither accepted.
Old saying - surgery successful, patient dead.
Guenter