On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:12:50PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
quoted
On this point, yes. Equivalent bit from the PB926 TRM:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dui0224i/Cacdijji.html
(There are differences between the PCI controllers on
the different boards. Differences I know of are:
* size of the three memory mapped regions
* whether the top bits of the PCI address come from the top
or bottom of the IMAP* registers
I believe (based on some experimentation and an educated guess)
that these both changed at the same point, but some of the board
TRMs claim to be part one way part the other, presumably due to
copy and paste error. In particular PB1176's TRM has a mangled
description of the IMAP* registers which didn't match what the
h/w actually did in my testing.)
Bah, updated TRMs since my version.
Right, so if I've traced everything correctly, this should work:
/*
* Slot INTA INTB INTC INTD
* 31 PCI1 PCI2 PCI3 PCI0
* 30 PCI0 PCI1 PCI2 PCI3
* 29 PCI3 PCI0 PCI1 PCI2
*/
return IRQ_SIC_PCI0 + ((slot + 2 + pin - 1) & 3);
I tried the above with qemu 1.5.2. Success!
Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
or do we need a test on real hardware ?
Thanks,
Guenter
---
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
index e92e5e0..53b4208 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
@@ -333,7 +333,11 @@ static int __init versatile_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
* 26 1 IRQ_SIC_PCI2
* 27 1 IRQ_SIC_PCI3
*/
+#if 0
irq = IRQ_SIC_PCI0 + ((slot - 24 + pin - 1) & 3);
+#else
+ irq = IRQ_SIC_PCI0 + ((slot + 2 + pin - 1) & 3);
+#endif
return irq;
}